Discussion Solved

How Indian researchers can bridge the gap between academia and industry (42)

Back to Forum
Starting 30 pts 0 followers
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay · Posted
Operations & Supply Chain

Background

I have been an Assistant Professor for three years now. Looking back, the most valuable thing in my career so far has been the research network I built.not my publications, not my grants, not my teaching record.

Here is what actually worked for building that network as a new faculty member:

  1. Email cold introductions after reading someone's paper.specific, about their work, not a generic 'let's collaborate' message. Response rate is surprisingly high (~40%) if the email shows you actually read the paper.

  2. Conference conversations.not the formal talks, but the coffee breaks and poster sessions. I have gotten more collaborators from standing next to someone at a coffee station than from any structured networking event.

  3. Reviewing papers.every paper you review is an invitation to learn what leading researchers in your area are working on before it is published.

  4. Social media presence.LinkedIn for professional connections, Twitter/X for research community discussions. One thread I posted on my research got picked up by a researcher at Cambridge who is now a collaborator.

What has worked for others?

Sign in to interact

Sign in to join the discussion.

31 Replies

Oldest Top
0
Disha Malhotra Starting 8 pts · Accepted answer

Seconding the recommendation for Zotero. Game changer for managing references across multiple projects.

0
Neha Agarwal Growing 90 pts · Accepted answer

I am in a very similar situation. Would you be willing to share the outline of your PMRF proposal? Not the content.just the section headings and approximate word allocation.

0
Tara Singh Starting 5 pts · Accepted answer

CSIR-UGC NET preparation: past papers are the most important resource. Everything else is secondary.

0
Admin NITK · Accepted answer

I am in a very similar situation. Would you be willing to share the outline of your PMRF proposal? Not the content.just the section headings and approximate word allocation.

0
Rekha Shetty Starting 40 pts · Accepted answer

CSIR-UGC NET preparation: past papers are the most important resource. Everything else is secondary.

0
Neha Agarwal Growing 90 pts · Accepted answer

I have successfully received PMRF (lateral entry, second year). Happy to share what worked in my proposal.

On the research proposal:

  • 60–70% technical approach, 30% context and impact
  • Preliminary results absolutely help. Coursework projects are fine if genuinely relevant
  • The societal impact section should be substantive.PMRF is a national initiative; reviewers want to see why this matters

On citations: Yes, cite your MTech thesis. Framing your PhD as an extension of prior work you did shows continuity of thought.

0
Manish Tiwari Starting 10 pts · Accepted answer

Check whether your institution has a Springer/Elsevier waiver agreement.many NITs and IITs do.

0
Arjun Venkatesan Growing 195 pts · Accepted answer

Overleaf + GitHub integration is underrated. You get version control and collaboration in one place.

0
Sowmya Narayanan Active 310 pts · Accepted answer

Strongly agree with the point about choosing venues carefully. One paper in NeurIPS > five papers in obscure workshops.

0
Replying to Sowmya Narayanan
Ravi Patel Starting 25 pts · Accepted answer

Thank you! The reference to MuRIL is particularly useful.I had not considered it as an alternative to XLM-R for Indic languages.

0
Replying to Sowmya Narayanan
Manish Tiwari Starting 10 pts · Accepted answer

This is exactly what I needed to hear. One clarifying question: you mentioned FedProx handles non-IID data better.does that mean I should switch to FedProx by default, or only if I observe poor convergence with FedAvg first?

0
Preethi Anand Distinguished 690 pts · Accepted answer

Strongly agree with the point about choosing venues carefully. One paper in NeurIPS > five papers in obscure workshops.

0
Replying to Preethi Anand
Amit Joshi Starting 15 pts · Accepted answer

Marking this as the accepted answer. Incredibly helpful and specific. Really appreciate you taking the time.

0
Replying to Preethi Anand
Jaya Lakshmanan Growing 50 pts · Accepted answer

The Fulbright SoP is very different from a typical PhD SoP. It needs to focus on cultural exchange and diplomacy, not just research.

0
Priya Nair · Accepted answer

Just to make sure I understand the Zotero workflow correctly.is the .bib file synced to Overleaf automatically every time you add a new paper, or do you need to trigger an export manually?

0
Hemant Patwa · Accepted answer

Flower (flwr) is the most actively maintained and research-friendly federated learning framework right now. My group has been using it for 18 months on a healthcare project with 4 hospital sites.

Strengths:

  • Clean simulation API that lets you test on a single machine before deploying
  • Good support for custom aggregation strategies (FedProx, FedNova)
  • Active Discord community with quick responses from the maintainers

For non-IID data specifically, look at the FedProx strategy.it handles heterogeneous data distributions much better than FedAvg.

0
Jaya Lakshmanan Growing 50 pts · Accepted answer

The short answer: it depends heavily on the journal and field, but here is a general framework.

If your null result is well-powered and the hypothesis was reasonable: Absolutely publish it. Null results in well-designed studies are as valuable as positive results. Journals like PLOS ONE explicitly welcome them.

If your study is underpowered: Be transparent about it. Report effect sizes and confidence intervals, not just p-values. A small, underpowered study with honest reporting is still a contribution.

What kills papers is when limitations are obvious but the authors have not addressed them.

0
Replying to Jaya Lakshmanan
Rajesh Kumar · Accepted answer

This is exactly what I needed. Thank you so much.I have been going back and forth on this for weeks and this clears it up completely.

0
Manish Tiwari Starting 10 pts · Accepted answer

Just to make sure I understand the Zotero workflow correctly.is the .bib file synced to Overleaf automatically every time you add a new paper, or do you need to trigger an export manually?

0
Asha Pillai Distinguished 880 pts · Accepted answer

I think you are conflating two separate problems here. The publish-or-perish culture creates pressure, yes.but the solution is not to criticize researchers who are navigating an unfair system. The real problem is with evaluation committees who treat publication count as a proxy for research quality. Fix the evaluation, and the incentives change.

Also worth noting: open review has been implemented in some fields and has its own problems. It can disadvantage early-career researchers who fear retaliation from senior colleagues they have reviewed critically.

0
Eshan Patil Growing 70 pts · Accepted answer

Check whether your institution has a Springer/Elsevier waiver agreement.many NITs and IITs do.

0
Replying to Eshan Patil
Fatima Sheikh Growing 95 pts · Accepted answer

Marking this as the accepted answer. Incredibly helpful and specific. Really appreciate you taking the time.

0
Replying to Eshan Patil
Ganesh Menon Growing 140 pts · Accepted answer

I am in a very similar situation. Would you be willing to share the outline of your PMRF proposal? Not the content.just the section headings and approximate word allocation.

0
Replying to Eshan Patil
Om Prakash Growing 55 pts · Accepted answer

Much appreciated. I will restructure my proposal along these lines. The point about societal impact being substantive is something I would have gotten wrong.

0
Ishaan Verma Growing 60 pts · Accepted answer

Could you clarify what you mean by results-blind review? I have heard of it but never understood how it works in practice. Wouldn't reviewers need to see results to evaluate whether the methodology is sound?

0
Replying to Ishaan Verma
Bindiya Thomas Growing 65 pts · Accepted answer

Seconding the recommendation for Zotero. Game changer for managing references across multiple projects.

0
Replying to Ishaan Verma
Asha Pillai Distinguished 880 pts · Accepted answer

This is exactly what I needed. Thank you so much.I have been going back and forth on this for weeks and this clears it up completely.

0
Replying to Ishaan Verma
Karthik Rajan Growing 180 pts · Accepted answer

+1 to everything said above. My experience was identical.

0
Quamar Ahmed Growing 65 pts · Accepted answer

As a senior faculty member (25 years in the system), I want to offer a different perspective. Yes, the pressures are real. But I have also seen the other side: students who produce excellent work, publish honestly, and build reputations over time. The system is imperfect but not entirely broken.

What has actually helped my students: choosing venues carefully (a few strong papers rather than many weak ones), developing genuine collaborations rather than transactional coauthorships.

0
Meghana Rao Growing 170 pts · Accepted answer

This is exactly what I needed to hear. One clarifying question: you mentioned FedProx handles non-IID data better.does that mean I should switch to FedProx by default, or only if I observe poor convergence with FedAvg first?

0
Ashwin Murthy Distinguished 560 pts · Accepted answer

Thank you for this detailed answer! A quick follow-up: when you mention cosine learning rate with warm-up, are you warming up the LoRA parameters specifically or the entire model including the frozen backbone?